Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: PAF = bright?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default PAF = bright?

    ive really been digging the '59 sound lately. but how much bottom end does it bring to the fight? would the C5 be a better choice? im trying to add that vintage growl but i really need the bottom to be reinforced. is it safe to say that all vintage/moderate output pickups are voiced pretty bright?? how about the air zone? i know its suppose to sound a little vintage and its eq'd with a lot of bass and mids...however, like i said, i really like the growl the '59 gives. i cant really describe what im hearing, i just like how the 59 sounds...i was almost dead set on a rio grande BBQ but im afraid it will be too smooth. i really dont want a smooth pickup...i want growling and spitting with decent bite and tight bottom. please help...

    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  2. #2
    Questionologist
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NORTH HOLLYWOOD (talk to me, So Cal members!)
    Age
    48
    Posts
    7,379
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    20

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    The C5 is basically a hotter, louder 59. Some complain that the C5 is a little thin in the midrange and I tend to agree. If that turns out to be the case with you, go with the Custom -- basically the same as the C5 but with a ceramic mag instead of A5. More mids and tighter lows by most accounts.

    EDIT: Not all vintage-voiced PAF-clone pu's are bright -- the Seth Lover and the Antiquities are pretty smooth, as is the Alnico 2 Pro.
    Last edited by Zhangliqun; 07-20-2007 at 02:41 PM.
    In 1861 as the Confederate forces were about to fire on Fort Sumter, the blue and gray had infinitely more in common than the blue and red today. What fellowship can "the truth shall set you free" ever have with "there is no truth, only points of view", or "what is truth?"

    Secession would be a horror. But barring a major national crisis like a Black Death magnitude epidemic or nuclear attack to erase once and for all the myth that truth is negotiable, it is coming.

  3. #3
    Lewguitar
    Guest

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zhangliqun View Post
    The C5 is basically a hotter, louder 59. Some complain that the C5 is a little thin in the midrange and I tend to agree. If that turns out to be the case with you, go with the Custom -- basically the same as the C5 but with a ceramic mag instead of A5. More mids and tighter lows by most accounts.

    EDIT: Not all vintage-voiced PAF-clone pu's are bright -- the Seth Lover and the Antiquities are pretty smooth, as is the Alnico 2 Pro.
    That was the case with me after trying the C5 for a few months and feeling that I wanted to hear more mids and less bite. So after trying the Custom Custom I finally settled on the Duncan Custom and the Custom is now my favorite bridge humbucker.

    But regarding the 59B, it's been a favorite of mine for many years and I have a Strat set up with the 59B as the bridge pickup and it sounds killer. I had a beautiful PRS for a while but everytime I'd compare it to my Strat with the 59B it was no contest and I eventually sold the PRS.

    The 59B has good mids...strong tight bass and toothy treble. It's the pickup I go to when I want to nail Clapton's Wheels of Fire tone or the tone of his SG that he played with Cream. It's also great (through a Marshall) for early EVH tone.

    Lew

  4. #4
    Ultimate Tone Slacker
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicago (NW Burbs)
    Posts
    1,961
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    21

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewguitar View Post
    That was the case with me after trying the C5 for a few months and feeling that I wanted to hear more mids and less bite. So after trying the Custom Custom I finally settled on the Duncan Custom and the Custom is now my favorite bridge humbucker.
    What's funny Lew is that I basically arrived at the same conclusion recently. The Custom was my first SD, now I'm using it again.

  5. #5
    Looking for Real Life drew_half_empty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ICT (wichita ks)
    Age
    25
    Posts
    6,705
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    '59s have PLENTY of bass response

    however from my expirience most all PAF's have kind of a loose bottom to them
    Quote Originally Posted by gibson175 View Post
    metal zones are for pussies.

  6. #6
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    how much of my recto could it handle? would i have to play on the vintage setting or back the gain way off? i dont play with too much gain as it is...i deffinately need that bottom end like i said, so would the air zone be a better choice? i think that 'mojo' i talked about is just that scooped middle. i really like it in the 59. the C5 clip is terrible and i dont really get **** outta that...i like the scooped aggression i guess, but i also need that body in there. am i asking for too much? any others that would fit the bill? how bout the patb-3??
    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  7. #7
    Fuzzy Guitars the guy who invented fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    North of Atlanta
    Posts
    21,297
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    199

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    How much of what could youre recto handle??

    Also, I have to mention...if you are talking about those acrylic guitars nopne of these rules of thumb will work right...the tonal difference between wood and plastic, acrylic, lucite, plexiglass, aluminum, kevlar, graphite, etc...anything thats NOT wood will change the tone WAY more than you think...

  8. #8
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    Quote Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire View Post
    How much of what could youre recto handle??

    Also, I have to mention...if you are talking about those acrylic guitars nopne of these rules of thumb will work right...the tonal difference between wood and plastic, acrylic, lucite, plexiglass, aluminum, kevlar, graphite, etc...anything thats NOT wood will change the tone WAY more than you think...
    how much of my mesa could the 59 handle? ive never had a PAF pickup before and i just wanted to know if the amp would completely over-power the pickup and turn it into hissing...and i actually am talking about those acrylics...do you think the 59 would help? i wanted to give them a vintage snarl but ****...im so tired of this **** i about dont want to do anything with them anymore. they look pretty ****in sweet i just wish they would sound a little better. i never say that im searching for pickups to beter the acryllics because i can never get a good opinion other than "sell them they're ****"...well im sorry, but ive heard ****ty 200$ no name knock-offs that ARE made of wood and sound a whole hell of a lot worse than these came STOCK!! i just want an unbiased answer is all. im afraid if i say right off the bat "these are for my acrylics" then no one will answer. so, would the 59's help my acrylics out?
    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  9. #9
    Stargatologist JB_From_Hell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Yellow Springs, Ohio
    Age
    33
    Posts
    15,229
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    The Air Zone is NOT vintagey in the least. It's billed as a "vintage output Tone Zone." Both are sweet pickups, but if you're after PAF-tone, stay away.

    The DiMarzio Air Classic is a sweet PAF, and handles high gain very well. The Duncan '59 is pretty awesome, too.

    If you have a few thousand disposable dollars, I'll hook ya up with a real set
    Buy the book in my avatar. It's pretty cool.

    http://jchutchins.net/site/order/

  10. #10
    Ultimate Tone Member Kivitel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    526
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    My recto couldn't handle all that mexican food!

  11. #11
    Ultimate Tone Member pstarove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Age
    33
    Posts
    474
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    From what I've heard, acrylic guitars have a very sharp, glassy top end. So paired with a '59 that is also very sharp, you better wear eyes protection! I suggest that you go for an Alnico II set, or a AIIP neck, CustomCustom bridge. I think they will complement acrylic better.

  12. #12
    LiteAshologist Robert Delahunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Misawa Japan
    Posts
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    Quote Originally Posted by anewdefguitarist View Post
    ive really been digging the '59 sound lately. but how much bottom end does it bring to the fight? would the C5 be a better choice? im trying to add that vintage growl but i really need the bottom to be reinforced. is it safe to say that all vintage/moderate output pickups are voiced pretty bright?? how about the air zone? i know its suppose to sound a little vintage and its eq'd with a lot of bass and mids...however, like i said, i really like the growl the '59 gives. i cant really describe what im hearing, i just like how the 59 sounds...i was almost dead set on a rio grande BBQ but im afraid it will be too smooth. i really dont want a smooth pickup...i want growling and spitting with decent bite and tight bottom. please help...

    As for bottom end, I own a '59 neck, and it's got bass, but I've never tried it in the bridge. But most PAFs that I've played in Les Pauls seem to have lots of bass yet not enough highs for me, at least the mahogany body ones. Now simply switch woods to Swamp Ash (the Les Paul Swamp Ash special) and it's got plenty brights for me. As for moderate output, the Pearly Gates Plus is what I have in my Showmaster, and it's got lots of mids, good lows, and decent brights (so in a different wood other than basswood it will probably have less mids, but still enough). As for growling and spitting, the Pearly Gates and Pearly Gates Plus should both cover this (but I've only experienced the PG+), and the JB that I owned also would have plenty of growl. I feel inadequately experienced to recommend anything other than PG+ or JB, but I've played enough Les Pauls.
    My Website || My Music
    Quote Originally Posted by US Declaration of Independence
    ... are endowed by their CREATOR with certain unalienable rights....
    Gear: Boss ME70, Ovation CC44, Lite Ash Strat, ESP EC-1000FM, '72 Twin Reverb, Fender Pro Junior

  13. #13
    Looking for Real Life drew_half_empty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    ICT (wichita ks)
    Age
    25
    Posts
    6,705
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    a '59 could 'handle' the mesa, of course depending on your settings, but they keep their articulation pretty well for humbuckers

    but yeah i know nothing about lucite guitars
    Quote Originally Posted by gibson175 View Post
    metal zones are for pussies.

  14. #14
    Fuzzy Guitars the guy who invented fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    North of Atlanta
    Posts
    21,297
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    199

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    I don't think you'll have any problems with the 59's (or any other pickup to be honest) and the Mesa...now ont he issue of the guitars, Imnot saying that you'll never get a good sound what I am saying is that 99.9% of people don't play non wooden guitars so if you ask someone about their pickup choises and take what they say to heart and then try the same pickups in your guitars don't expect the same result...you'll get similar results but the tone will be different.

    Now, if you buy new Duncans you have a 21 day exchange option and IMO oyu can't beat that! The best advise I can give you is to get a set of pickups, try them and see for yourself...FWIW, inmy experience with lucite and plexiglass guitars they tend to have a VERY dense bottom, a very defined (but sharp) midrange and a very odd (not bad, just different) top end responce...newck pickups that might work well would be (IMO of course) 59's and Alnico II Pro's, when you get to the bridge pickup I would go form somethng hotter and if it were me I'd try a Custom or a JB.

    Good luck!

  15. #15
    Toneologist walt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    698
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    If you are looking at PAF style pickups, I would highly recommend the VHPaf and swap the magnet with an A2. This pickup rocks in my strat and this strat has had a 59, JB, Custom, CC, C5, Pearly Gates, Air Zone, ToneZone, Norton, and Super D and the VHPaf is much better than the others I've tried imho. Very versitale, open sounding pickup.

  16. #16
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    Quote Originally Posted by walt View Post
    If you are looking at PAF style pickups, I would highly recommend the VHPaf and swap the magnet with an A2. This pickup rocks in my strat and this strat has had a 59, JB, Custom, CC, C5, Pearly Gates, Air Zone, ToneZone, Norton, and Super D and the VHPaf is much better than the others I've tried imho. Very versitale, open sounding pickup.
    speakin of dimarzio's, anybody know what vai uses in his new acryllic ibanez? i saw an add in Guitar one or something that said it was a special pickup but i cant find anything on it...
    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  17. #17
    Ultimate Tone Member BRHGM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Age
    49
    Posts
    419
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    I agree with Lew, sounds like you want a Custom. I have one in the bridge of my Steinberger. I also like the 59n in the bridge of my Tele. IT has plenty of bottom and goes from vintage to biting sound. Think Mick Mars with a lot of distorion and Clapton with tone rolled back. The C5 is a 59 on steroids and the CC is an APH on steroids. The BBQ is much crunchier and won't clean up the same as the Custom or the 59.

  18. #18
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    thank you guys for these suggestions and putting up with my acryllic questions. i really hate to get rid of them as they're really like a part of me now. i've had them for about 4 years and people still come up and say "are you the guy with the clear guitars?" i've just recently started to "grow up" and our band is starting to take off a little more than any of us thought (not hoped, but thought) and i dont want to sound rinky dink, i want to sound the best that we can.

    ive really been diggin that vintage crunch lately. i dunno, it just is really connecting with me right now for some reason. i kinda want like a george thorogood on steroids kinda thing outta those guitars. and guy who invented fire, you're **** right about your description of their sound -

    "...FWIW, inmy experience with lucite and plexiglass guitars they tend to have a VERY dense bottom, a very defined (but sharp) midrange and a very odd (not bad, just different) top end responce..."

    thats about the best iv'e heard it described. everything just seems a little "dense" very "blunt" sounding...it doesnt' have really a touch of anything, its like everything wants to jump out at you. having an all tube nice amp really made a difference too. you can't imagine how it sounded through SS amps. ssshhhrrriiiillll. so anyways, thanks all for the wisdom guys. hopefully i can pull them **** trigger soon and get some stuff put in to these babies and see what happens. if nothin works you may see one on the trading post, lol. thanks again.

    have a good one
    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  19. #19
    Toneologist anewdefguitarist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    759
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    so i guess my initial question are PAF's generally brighter toned/voiced? or should i go for a modern style pickup?
    GUITARS
    Jackson Matt Tuck Sig RR - EMG 81/85
    ESP Viper 301 - Distortion
    Dillion Acrylic V - stock
    Tradition Strat - stock

    AMPS
    Mesa Single Rectifier 1x12 combo
    w/ Marshall JCM900 1936 cab 2x12 w/ GT-75's

  20. #20
    Ultimate Tone Member pstarove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Age
    33
    Posts
    474
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: PAF = bright?

    There are a lot of PAFs, some are bright like the '59s and Burstbucker Pros, others are smoother and mellower (like A2Ps), '57 Classic/Classic Plus. IMHO for a composite material guitar like acrylic, Alnico2 magnets are the must.

    I have a similar experience with a graphite necked Steinberger GSX. I tried a lot of pickups in it, everything sounded too hi-fi. Only the A2 Burstbuckers helped to tame that. But the guitar is still a little too bright, I think '57 Classics would be a better choice for it.

    For your guitar I recommend any of those pickups: SD Antiquities, Alnico II Pros, Gibson '57Classic/Classic Plus. If you want a more modern, higher gain sound, the Custom Custom will be a good choice for the bridge, although I think '57Classic Plus has more than enough output.
    Guitars (from favorite to less favorite):Parker Fly Deluxe, "Frankenstrat":B.C.Rich neck+Shamray CS body, Orville by Gibson Black Beauty Reissue, Steinberger GSXSTD

    Pickups I currently own: Custom wound pickups a la Dimarzio VPAF/VHPAF with mismatched coils and Alnico2 magnets, Shadow SH-EQ5, SH-663 actives, Gibson '57 Classics and Burstbuckers

    Pickups I tried and sold: SD Hot Rails, Invader, Gibson 496R, 500T, EMG 89, 89R, Dimarzio AirNorton, Norton, ToneZone, AirZone, Parker Fly Customs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •