I'm super rusty on my rules. Can anyone help me out with:
Q^2 / 400
?
I'm super rusty on my rules. Can anyone help me out with:
Q^2 / 400
?
You have to tell us what you are taking the derivative with respect to.
d/dQ (Q^2/400) and d/dt(Q^2/400) are different.
The first is most likely what you are referring to (unless you are doing physics), and the answer would be Q/200.



"So you'll never have to listen to surf music again."
Gear
Peavey Windsor
Jackson DK2 - Duncan Loaded



MIA Fender Deluxe Strat (Surfer Set/Custom Bridge)
MIJ Strat APS1/APS1/PATB-3
MIA Tele APTL-1/APTR-1
69' SF Bassman/ 212 Avatar Cab.
Ibanez LR10 Semi Hollow Body
Martin D28



General rule for derivatives of polynomial (x^n)
d/dx (x^n) = n*x^(n-1)
Yeah, I still remembered that. Just wasn't sure about the bottom number. I didn't know if I left it alone or if it became zero (and of course you can't divide by zero). I see now, but I was going by the general rule when doing derivatives and partial derivatives that constants are zero, a variable times a constant is a constant, etc.
In short I was looking at the 400 and wondering if I treated it like a constant.



you're best considering it as (1/400)Q².. anytime you can make a fraction appear as seperate expressions like that, it's usually simpler to do so![]()
d/dQ (Q^2/400) = Q/200 + x ... can't forget the constant
gear list in profile
"no seymour - no tone ... know seymour - know tone!"
Is it not the glory of the people of America that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience?" - James Madison - Federalist #14



Hm.. Perhaps you're thinking about integral math regarding the constant there..?
If you take the derivative of e.g. f(Q) = Q²/400 + 5, that can be read as Q²/400 + 5*Q^0 as Q^0=1. So the derivative will thus be f'(Q) = 2Q/400 + 0*5^(-1) = Q/200
But if you integrate f'(Q) again, you know that it originally was a constant there, but you aren't "supposed to know", so therefore an unknown constant "jumps" in again for the integral..
Last edited by Tor; 09-25-2008 at 04:31 AM.
gear list in profile
"no seymour - no tone ... know seymour - know tone!"
Is it not the glory of the people of America that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience?" - James Madison - Federalist #14



No problem.![]()
gear list in profile
"no seymour - no tone ... know seymour - know tone!"
Is it not the glory of the people of America that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience?" - James Madison - Federalist #14



Why are there no zingers from newking or sososomething in this thread?![]()
Or an Odie reply like "d/dQ (Q^2/400) = Q/200 + x = CHOWDER"
Sorry, I sucked at math, didnt mean to interrupt one of the few threads here with thinking involved
Dano
EVH: "I'm a tone chaser... I love chasin' tone!"