Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,307
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Looking for a tighter, brighter Super Distortion sound-- would the Super 2 in the bridge do the trick?

    For those that have tried it, how did it work out? What did it sound like?

    Guitar in question is a maple/rosewood neck, alder body, strat hardtail, 10-46's tuned down 1/2 step, single 500K volume knob.

  2. #2
    Ultimate Tone Member Grenade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    578
    Likes (Given)
    55
    Likes (Received)
    71

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    My Tele copy was like yours except for 9's and Super 2 really brought it to life.Very nice.

  3. #3
    Ultimate Tone Slacker
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,897
    Likes (Given)
    137
    Likes (Received)
    27

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    If you want a tighter and brighter super you want the 3.....

  4. #4
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,307
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    nope, I tried the Super 3 and it's got more mids than the Super D but the highs are chopped.

  5. #5
    Ultimate Tone Slacker
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,897
    Likes (Given)
    137
    Likes (Received)
    27

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I don't know if you'll dig the 2 than, have you thought about the Duncan Distortion??? The DDN in the bridge would certainly be tighter and brighter than an super D, at least to me.....

  6. #6
    Mojo's Minions JeffB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    12,706
    Likes (Given)
    169
    Likes (Received)
    72

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    The 3 is way thicker and darker than the original SD.

    The 2 is definitely brighter, but it's also not as thick meaty. I think it makes a good neck pup to match a super, but I don't think I'd want one in the bridge.

    If you want brighter, and don't mind the output, go with a X2N
    I'm an internet person. All we do is waste time evaluating things that have next-to-zero real world significance.

    Remember, it's just a plank of wood. YOU have to find the music in it - The Telecaster Handbook

  7. #7
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,307
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I've had the X2n on the radar for a while. Wonder if that one would sound best w/ a 1 meg volume pot?

    Also, on the Super 3, I wonder if I turned up the presence and treble on my amp, if it would get me where I need to be? They say it's tuned so that you can do that and not have things mush out.

  8. #8
    Mojo's Minions JeffB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    12,706
    Likes (Given)
    169
    Likes (Received)
    72

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Quote Originally Posted by appar111 View Post
    I've had the X2n on the radar for a while. Wonder if that one would sound best w/ a 1 meg volume pot?

    Also, on the Super 3, I wonder if I turned up the presence and treble on my amp, if it would get me where I need to be? They say it's tuned so that you can do that and not have things mush out.

    IME it's just a thick, really thick pickup (super 3 that is)- if your guitar is bright and has lots of string to string clarity it would probably be OK. The best thing to do would probably be cruise yootoob for more recent clips of Phill Collen with Def Leppard, he's about the only "big name" I know of who uses them.


    However, My perosnal feeling is it's pretty much like the Custom Custom-no matter what you do to it, it's going to sound thick/darker just buy it's nature and never have the string to string clarity of say the Custom5. Trying to compensate with an amp or EQ pedal for a fundamental "lack of " something in a guitar or pickup has cost me LOTS of money over the years and never been all that successful.

    As for the X2N, I'd stick with 500K, I suspect it would get VERY abrasive with a 1 meg pot.
    I'm an internet person. All we do is waste time evaluating things that have next-to-zero real world significance.

    Remember, it's just a plank of wood. YOU have to find the music in it - The Telecaster Handbook

  9. #9
    Unremarkable Tone Slacker formula73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,571
    Likes (Given)
    899
    Likes (Received)
    267

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffB View Post
    IME it's just a thick, really thick pickup (super 3 that is)- if your guitar is bright and has lots of string to string clarity it would probably be OK. The best thing to do would probably be cruise yootoob for more recent clips of Phill Collen with Def Leppard, he's about the only "big name" I know of who uses them.


    However, My perosnal feeling is it's pretty much like the Custom Custom-no matter what you do to it, it's going to sound thick/darker just buy it's nature and never have the string to string clarity of say the Custom5. Trying to compensate with an amp or EQ pedal for a fundamental "lack of " something in a guitar or pickup has cost me LOTS of money over the years and never been all that successful.

    As for the X2N, I'd stick with 500K, I suspect it would get VERY abrasive with a 1 meg pot.
    I don't know about the pot value. The newer X2Ns, to my ears, aren't nearly as bright as the older X2N Power Plus, and I think the only difference is the baseplates. I've been through a couple of the newer ones and they've all moved on. If I want massive power, thick mids, and lots of bass, I'll get an Invader. If I want massive power, more balanced mids with lots of highs, I get an X2N.
    Quote Originally Posted by Empty Pockets View Post
    the Les Paul is the ultimate electric guitar.
    i know that's a pretty heavy statement to make and a bunch of dudes that love Teles and shredsticks are gona argue with me, but they're wrong.
    anything you can't do on a Les Paul is because you haven't practiced enough or you don't rock hard enough.
    Quote Originally Posted by sosomething View Post
    You put the "pow" in "power bottom."
    Quote Originally Posted by MetalManiac View Post
    *Thumpety Thump Thump Thump...WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP"

  10. #10
    Mojo's Minions JeffB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    12,706
    Likes (Given)
    169
    Likes (Received)
    72

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Quote Originally Posted by formula73 View Post
    I don't know about the pot value. The newer X2Ns, to my ears, aren't nearly as bright as the older X2N Power Plus, and I think the only difference is the baseplates. I've been through a couple of the newer ones and they've all moved on. If I want massive power, thick mids, and lots of bass, I'll get an Invader. If I want massive power, more balanced mids with lots of highs, I get an X2N.
    Hmm.. wasn't aware Dimarzio had changed them in recent years, I was definitely referencing older X2Ns.

    IDK why they would eff with a good thing.
    I'm an internet person. All we do is waste time evaluating things that have next-to-zero real world significance.

    Remember, it's just a plank of wood. YOU have to find the music in it - The Telecaster Handbook

  11. #11
    Unremarkable Tone Slacker formula73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Portsmouth, VA
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,571
    Likes (Given)
    899
    Likes (Received)
    267

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Quote Originally Posted by JeffB View Post
    Hmm.. wasn't aware Dimarzio had changed them in recent years, I was definitely referencing older X2Ns.

    IDK why they would eff with a good thing.
    Probably to keep manufacturing costs down. I bet those brass baseplates, combined with no longer using that plastic clip to hold the wire (remember that?), save them $.15 per unit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Empty Pockets View Post
    the Les Paul is the ultimate electric guitar.
    i know that's a pretty heavy statement to make and a bunch of dudes that love Teles and shredsticks are gona argue with me, but they're wrong.
    anything you can't do on a Les Paul is because you haven't practiced enough or you don't rock hard enough.
    Quote Originally Posted by sosomething View Post
    You put the "pow" in "power bottom."
    Quote Originally Posted by MetalManiac View Post
    *Thumpety Thump Thump Thump...WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP"

  12. #12
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,307
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Quote Originally Posted by formula73 View Post
    I don't know about the pot value. The newer X2Ns, to my ears, aren't nearly as bright as the older X2N Power Plus, and I think the only difference is the baseplates. I've been through a couple of the newer ones and they've all moved on. If I want massive power, thick mids, and lots of bass, I'll get an Invader. If I want massive power, more balanced mids with lots of highs, I get an X2N.
    What were the baseplates made out of on the old X2Ns?

  13. #13
    Mojo's Minions King IzzO)))'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    p00p™
    Age
    36
    Posts
    5,420
    Likes (Given)
    334
    Likes (Received)
    298

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I like the Super3, but I like dark pickups. If you want something that hot, but brighter, a Duncan Distortion, X2N, and 500T should be on your list.

    I've heard that the Super2 is a PAFPro with a big ceramic, which sounds about right. I don't think that would make a bridge pickup I'd ever want to use.
    Last edited by King IzzO))); 09-29-2011 at 07:49 AM.

  14. #14
    Toneologist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    741
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I'm not a Super Distortion fan, but I liked the Super 2 in the bridge and neck of an old Melody Maker and Dean.

  15. #15
    Ultimate Tone Slacker whatshisname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,305
    Likes (Given)
    46
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I had one, in the bridge of a Strat. I absolutely HATED it, and this is from a guy that loves the Super Distortion. On paper, it seemed like it would be great, but in practice, it just didn't work for me. I found it too stiff, and lifeless.

    Now, this was about 20 years ago, so I might feel different about it, now. I wish I would have tried it as a neck pickup, or in a Gibson. Maybe one day, I'll grab one, and try it again.

  16. #16
    Mojo's Minions 75lespaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New Joisey
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,964
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Put one in my friend's taco bell strat when we thought it was a Super Distortion. Sounded absolutely killer. Through his rig and mine, it sounded great. We then changed the magnet on the stock humbucker with an UOA5, and it opened up the guitar even more. The original pickup sounded like it had a wet blanket over it, but after the mag swap, it roared.
    My songs....enjoy! (hopefully )

    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...?bandID=652921
    or for older stuff too, but slower downloads
    http://www.acidplanet.com/artist.asp...=301569&T=7414

    Quote Originally Posted by DankStar View Post
    700 watts is ok for small clubs, but when you play with a loud drummer or at a medium-large sized venue, you really need 1,500-watts at least. no one should be left alive.

  17. #17
    Junior Member Ludwigvan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    20
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Super 2s are quite bright but personally I think they work best with a lot of distortion from an American amp, so it depends on what you're playing.

    PAF Pros are quite similar to Super Distortions but a lot brighter and slightly less output. They are very bright though, maybe too bright if you intend it for a bridge pickup.

    I think a Tonezone would fit the bill nicely. They have plenty of top end but aren't shrill. They have a good dose of mids which makes them very clear, even a little unforgiving but if you're playing a British type amp they're great. Especially with alder. And if the output is too high you can use an Airzone, it's basically the same as a Tonezone just a little more vintage sounding.

  18. #18
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,307
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Wow, all kinds of info I wouldnt have expected... Tone Zone unforgiving? Super 2 sounds great, Super 2 sounds awful. X2N's don't sound the same as the old ones....

    All over the map! I suppose if I get a new Super 2 and dont like it I can always exchange under Dimarzio's exchange policy.

    500T is on the radar too-- sounded great in this guitar when it had an all maple neck on it instead of the rosewood board that's on it now. Should be able to find a used one for about 50 bucks, too...

    So 500T or a Super 2 depending on what I can find used for the best price.

    Thanks guys!
    Last edited by appar111; 09-29-2011 at 02:51 PM.

  19. #19
    Ultimate Tone Slacker whatshisname's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,305
    Likes (Given)
    46
    Likes (Received)
    12

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    I figured I'd let you guys know the rig I was using, when I had the Super 2. I was using a rack, with an ADA MP-1, BBE, Digitech effects, and a MosValve 500 power amp(that's all I remember right now).

    It sounded great, with my Gibsons, and other guitars, but that Strat/Super 2 combo just didn't work with it.

  20. #20
    Junior Member Ludwigvan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    20
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Super 2 in the bridge - who's tried it?

    Tone Zone unforgiving?
    I meant as in it's such a clear and articulate pickup it can really highlight bad technique, like if you're bad at muting or your dynamics aren't consistent. Some pickups have a really compressed kind of sound that's flattering to your playing although it means you sacrifice control.

    The 500T is a great pickup, I have one in an old Gibson of mine. Some people think it can be too shrill but I've never found that to be the case.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •