Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Wilkinson vs. Hardtail

  1. #1
    Ultimate Tone Slacker MattPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,694
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Wilkinson vs. Hardtail

    OK, I'm going to get off my butt and order my new Warmoth project. It's going to be a swamp ash strat with humbuckers and a Graphtech piezo bridge. I've already tried the humbuckers in my hardtail swamp ash strat, so I know that this should sound pretty sweet.

    My question is: if I go for a non-recessed Wilkinson trem that rests flush on the body, will it have the same sustain and tonal characteristics as a hardtail?
    This machine kills fascists

  2. #2
    Senior Member celticafro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    29
    Posts
    66
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Wilkinson vs. Hardtail

    I imagine that it would not sound quite the same as a hardtail. You'll have an extra body cavity, first of all, as well as the springs inside that cavity that will affect the sound. Plus, your bridge will move.

    I prefer hardtails to trems, since I don't do a whole lot of that kind of guitar work. They have a more solid tone to them, the notes just don't go anywhere.
    "No Wockin' Furries"

    Maton EBG808L; G&L ASAT Special

    Mesa/Boogie MkIIb; (no cab yet)

    Boss TR3; Boss DD6; BYOC MXR Dist+

  3. #3
    Moe's Bluesman Curly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    63
    Posts
    6,893
    Likes (Given)
    29
    Likes (Received)
    10

    Default Re: Wilkinson vs. Hardtail

    no
    "music heals"
    facebook

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •