if so, in what way? i'm using a walnut body, mahagony neck, and rosewood fretboard. i was thinking sg thickness maybe strat, probably not though. i'd also like to know what this guitar would sound like. since i'm not a guitar wood guy.



if so, in what way? i'm using a walnut body, mahagony neck, and rosewood fretboard. i was thinking sg thickness maybe strat, probably not though. i'd also like to know what this guitar would sound like. since i'm not a guitar wood guy.


More mass I would think effects it. I mean, if you press the headstock of your guitar against the wall without it plugged in and play and take it away from the wall there's a definite difference in sound.
Equipment:
Squier Stratocaster CII (JB/Stock Singles)
Electro-Harmonix Big Muff
Crate GT212
Wanting To Buy:
Les Paul Pickguard
ToM Bridge+Tailpiece
Big Jesus


From my understanding, thinner bodies have less lows and mids, but mahogany bodies could possibly make up for the mids. Something around Les Paul thickness will have a much beefier, fatter tone to it, compared to a body thats thinner. I don't know much about wood species, so I can't help ya there.
The G.B. Kirch Band on Facebook!
And Here on Bandcamp!
Crankin' a Gibson Les Paul and a Fender Strat into a Crate V32, in an attempt to deafen those who don't enjoy good ol' fashioned blues and rock n' roll
That's why I love mahogany! You can cut it thin and it'll still have balls! In my experience lows and mids have more to do with the wood/pickups/amp/etc. To my ears (I've owned Strats, Teles, EBs, SGs, and LP-types), the thickness of the body seems to correlate to thickness in tone. Body wood does play a role here too though.Originally Posted by Corbic
I'm not sure walnut would be a good choice for a thin body. I know they made walnut SGs in the 70's, but they are seemingly not very popular. I like a dark sounding wood in a thin bodied guitar.
Walnut is a heavy wood, about like maple. If you go very thick it will weigh way too much. Walnut is also rather bright sounding wood, but your using the warmer neck woods. This will probably off set the brightness of the body some, imparting more warmth. I am finding more and more ,that the neck woods have as much to do with, and maybe more, with tone, as do the body woods and thickness. I don't think you need go overly thick on the body in such a case.



I get a lttle freaked about the "walnut body" guitars.
Why? Walnut is sooo precious/beautiful/strong, yet easy to work (compared to ash/oak/hickory). The fact is, walnut is THE MOST PERFECT WOOD for firearms gunstocks. This has been true for centuries! Recoil is absorbed by walnut like no other wood or material known to mankind. From .22 rimfire to "elephant guns", walnut is the wood!
Walnut aborbs energy. A maple gunstock in high a power weapon would kick like a mule!
I guess I should answer the question! Yes, the thickness affects the tone. Between my mahogany solidibodes, the Epi SG body is thinner and has less bass. What it does have, is a concentrated low-mid, like that of a large mammal/human roar. The larger 335-S sounds like a mellow Les Paul.
Last edited by Sludgenutz; 01-24-2006 at 06:58 PM.



Walnut is an intriguing subject, because in theory it sounds like an ideal wood for guitars, yet it's rarely used. I've even heard an old vintage Ludwig Walnut drumkit that sounded huge. However, it never shows up on guitars, except for a few that never sold well. I'm wondering what's the deal?Originally Posted by Sludgenutz
As far as thickness........Thin guitars sound thin. PRS makes the Custom 22 and McCarty. The McCarty is thicker and sounds thicker. That's the best comparison model I can think of.



I think you may have just answered the question about why walnut is not used often in guitars. If it absorbs recoil in a gunstock, what is it going to do to sound vibrations from some itty bitty steel strings? The idea of a rock maple gunstock terrifies meOriginally Posted by Sludgenutz
Maple transmits energy very well - maybe that's why it's so good for guitar necks and is usually used for the "sustain block" in semi-hollow guitars.
Actually, IIRC spruce transmits vibrations better and faster than almost any other species, and that's why it is used for acoustic guitar tops & braces. Maybe walnut is toward the other end of the spectrum...
These aren't "facts", just brainstorming based on limited knowledge.
Chip
Im guessing it can also be the cut of wood used, like if you got screwed with a bad cut of mohogany or something it wouldn't sound so great.
Cambiar de imanes es falso y maricon



A walnut SG is going to be a bright guitar, perhaps overly so.
I think that a mahogany body with a walnut cap would be a friendlier guitar.
Ain't nothin' but a G thang, baby.



Will the body thickness change the tone: Definitely
HOW will it change the tone: Believe it or not, this depends more on the body shape than the amount of wood being removed![]()
Zerberus Industries: Where perfection isn't good enough.
The thickness, weight and resonance of the body makes a big diff.
But also: one cutaway or two makes a huge diff.
A single cutaway Les Paul will usually sound deeper and fuller compared to a double cutaway. The neck is a lot stiffer and better supported in a single cutaway.
That's one reason why single cutaway Les Pauls sound so good!