Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

  1. #1
    Tone Member kill your scene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    300
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I've noticed that both Seymour Duncan and DiMarzio offer an extremely wide variety of quality products to satisfy the needs of many players.

    So what's the real difference between Duncan and DiMarzio? Why do you keep playing Duncans? Do you think brand name loyalty is pointless or do you have a distinct favorite? Do you think both companies are too similar to compare or do you see one as superior?

    I'm curious as to what people think.
    It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
    - David St. Hubbins

  2. #2
    DyzaBoyzologist That90'sGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    CT representin'
    Age
    28
    Posts
    11,290
    Likes (Given)
    248
    Likes (Received)
    61

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    To be honest, I like both Dimarzio and Seymour Duncan. While they both offer a wide spectrum of products, they still aim to do things different than each other. Dimarzio is lame for that cream bobbins patent, but I will admit that I really like one of their products.

    I'm loyal to whatever pup maker gives me the tone I want. I think SD makes some of the best and that's shown through the pros that use them. I don't think any of us would be on this forum if we didn't love their pups to begin with

    I think the only pups I hated were EMGs and that was because everything was too sterile to my ears (the Dave Gilmour and Zakk Wylde sets sound like trash). Distortion wise they were great, but I need more versatility.
    Quote Originally Posted by kevlar3000 View Post
    I learned a long time ago that the only thing that mattered regarding tone was what my ears thought.
    Quote Originally Posted by the guy who invented fire View Post
    Man, you are going thru all the hot pedals like a true TGP'er!
    Quote Originally Posted by Zerberus View Post
    Better is often the enemy of good

  3. #3
    Super Toneologist I_M_Ken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,316
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Well i agree with Chris about both making really great products.
    personally i am a duncan and dimarzio user and i find that they're both doing a great job with the pups.
    brand loyalty IS pointless. whatever company gives u a product that u like is wats most important.
    i use Lace pups too for my single coils and they're great, better than any dimarzio or duncan i tried IMO.
    anywya its pointless to compare duncans and dimarzios coz they're just different. its like comparing apples and oranges and it'll get u nowhere.

    and yes i have to admit that dimarzio SUCKS for the cream bobbin patent as well.
    1987 Ibanez RG550: Steve Special, SSL-2, Air Norton
    1999 Jackson PS6T-KE: Crazy 8
    Jackson KVX10: X2N
    1997 Epi Les Paul Slash: Virtual PAF, Hum From Hell
    Early 90's Yamaha RGZ621D: JB, Screamin' Demon
    http://fusionken.blogspot.com
    http://project-jeng.blogspot.com

  4. #4
    Toneologist Neeradj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Hague, Holland
    Age
    25
    Posts
    668
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    "So what's the real difference between Duncan and DiMarzio?"
    My other two forum bros covered this one. I just wanted to add DiMarzios always seem to be more shreddy or modern, there's always a slight similarity between all DiMarzios. I think that if I would go vintage or want my pick ups to sound more different, I'd go Duncan.

    "Why do you keep playing Duncans?"
    I like DiMarzios and Bill Lawrences too, but I've never been let down by Duncan. My first experience with DiMarzio (the Tone Zone) was a bit dissapointing, but the Paf Pro really got my attention again. With Duncan I never feel like I'm missing something in versatilly, they almost always seem to hit the spot. The Bill Lawrences are great too, but they're too defined for one musical style which is in your face Metal, that's why I'm keeping the L500XL, but won't ever buy one for another axe because I don't play that much Metal.
    I've also tried EMG 81s but they're never to my liking, maybe someday I'll try the EMG 60 or 85 but that day is far far away. Gibsons also almost never hit the spot, although the Dirty Finger bridge did do nicely! Ibanez pick ups never seem that well made, and Fender pick ups are the Gibson story all over again.

    "Do you think brand name loyalty is pointless or do you have a distinct favorite? Do you think both companies are too similar to compare or do you see one as superior?"
    Only a favorite in sound my friend, I couln't care less whether it said Seymour Duncan on the bobbin or not. Both companies are just different like I M KEN clearly explained
    Jackson USA '98 Custom Shop KE2 w/ Duncan TB-4 JB(b) & Jazz(n)
    Gibson '87 Flying V Designer w/ Duncan Screamin' Demon (n) & Bill Lawrence L500XL (b)
    Fender '70 Stratocaster w/ stock pick ups

    VHT Ultralead plugged into a
    Marshall 2x12 Vintage
    Bogner Shiva oversized 1x12 cab (Celestion Classic Lead 80 loaded)

    (80's Gibson Dirty Finger pick ups (b&n) on the side)

  5. #5
    Raging BB Gunologist some_dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    In a van, down by the river.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    5,647
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I like Duncan, DiMarzio and EMG. I'm not a particularily loyal customer, I'll go wherever I feel like it, and I'll get what I think sounds best.

    It was a real toss-up for new pickups for my LP. I couldn't decide between a JB/Jazz or EMG 85/81. The deciding factor was that I wanted a metal guitar, and I already had a JB (soon to be adding a Jazz) in another guitar.
    If you can't play good, play loud.

    Sh*t
    Guitar -> Wah -> Amp -> Cab

  6. #6
    Peaveyologist ArtieToo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    14,173
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    46

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    For me, its the forum. If I wanted to buy a DiMarzio, it'ld be a shot in the dark.
    This forum has allowed me to make a pretty good informed decision as to which Duncan to select.

    For that, I reward them with my loyalty. And, I don't think I'm losing out on anything. I can't imagine that DiMarzio makes a pickup that SD doesn't cover.

  7. #7
    Super Toneologist
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,181
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Quote Originally Posted by ArtieToo
    I can't imagine that DiMarzio makes a pickup that SD doesn't cover.

    They make a whole line of them. They are completely different...I'm serious. I use both Duncans and Dimarzios as well as EMGs and each company has it's own distinct flavors of pickups.

    Duncan has no pickup like the Super Distortion or the Super3 but then again, Dimarzio has no pickup like the JB or Pearly Gates either.

  8. #8
    Peaveyologist ArtieToo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    14,173
    Likes (Given)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    46

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Yeah . . . sometimes you don't really realize how dumb something you say is - 'til you see it in print.

  9. #9
    Toneologist RG 2570's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    670
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I prefer dimarzio's because my weapon of choice is the ibanez RG series guitars, and dimarzio just sounds best in these? dont ask me why,but they do?
    in a gibson,PRS,or epiphone i would opt for duncans,but for the shred guitars like ibanez, jackson,ESP, to my ears the dimarzios work the best.
    everytime i try a duncan in the RG it sounds anemic,flat and wrong?

  10. #10
    King of the Groaner LesStrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pun-king the membership
    Age
    49
    Posts
    37,459
    Likes (Given)
    3965
    Likes (Received)
    861

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I play SD's in LesStrat, and Dimarzio Designed in the Nitefly (sc's). The Nitefly is one of the most versatile instruments I've ever played. So I won't criticize Dimarzio. However, for aftermarket pups, I'll probably stick with SD because they produce the tones I most prefer.

  11. #11
    Lewguitar
    Guest

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    To me, Duncans are more like vintage Fenders and Gibsons...they have the vintage vibe. Even the hotter pickups like the JB, Custom Custom, etc.

    Dimarzios just beg to be plugged into a hot Marshall...right from the get go!
    That seems to be the market Dimarzio goes for.

    Lew

  12. #12
    Great White Malice Thames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicoutimi Quebec Canada
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,167
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I keep using Duncan 'cause Evan (Skopp) handles marketing strategies pretty damn well...


    I've used some Dimarzios in the past, Super 2 and 3 and some PAF, they were pretty nice and different from Duncans. They are both great products.
    You like Zeppelin ? Hear my band !
    http://www.led-zepped.com

    Guitars :
    Gibson SG Std, Edwards JP LP, "Dragon" Telecaster, Fender Strat, Danelecto 59DC, AGILE Valkyrie Double-neck, Tak EG363SC.
    Marshall Superbass, Hiwatt DR504,... lots of effects
    P'ups tried : too much...

  13. #13
    Administrator Evan Skopp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA
    Posts
    5,516
    Likes (Given)
    75
    Likes (Received)
    247

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Quote Originally Posted by Thames
    I keep using Duncan 'cause Evan (Skopp) handles marketing strategies pretty damn well
    I swear I didn't pay Thames to say that.

    But Thames, for your brand loyalty, a truck will be pulling up in front of your house this morning with a bunch of '59 Bursts. Just pick the two or three you like the best and e-Bay the others. Cheers, mate.

  14. #14
    Great White Malice Thames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Chicoutimi Quebec Canada
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,167
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Quote Originally Posted by Evan Skopp
    I swear I didn't pay Thames to say that.

    But Thames, for your brand loyalty, a truck will be pulling up in front of your house this morning with a bunch of '59 Bursts. Just pick the two or three you like the best and e-Bay the others. Cheers, mate.


    You like Zeppelin ? Hear my band !
    http://www.led-zepped.com

    Guitars :
    Gibson SG Std, Edwards JP LP, "Dragon" Telecaster, Fender Strat, Danelecto 59DC, AGILE Valkyrie Double-neck, Tak EG363SC.
    Marshall Superbass, Hiwatt DR504,... lots of effects
    P'ups tried : too much...

  15. #15
    Super Toneologist I_M_Ken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Age
    30
    Posts
    1,316
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Quote Originally Posted by RG 2570
    I prefer dimarzio's because my weapon of choice is the ibanez RG series guitars, and dimarzio just sounds best in these? dont ask me why,but they do?
    in a gibson,PRS,or epiphone i would opt for duncans,but for the shred guitars like ibanez, jackson,ESP, to my ears the dimarzios work the best.
    everytime i try a duncan in the RG it sounds anemic,flat and wrong?
    well, i beg to differ, heh.
    i got a duncan pup in my Ibanez RG550 and that pup sounds a lot better than the few dimarzios i tried in there.
    the PATB-2 is in the bridge of my Ibanez Rg550.
    1987 Ibanez RG550: Steve Special, SSL-2, Air Norton
    1999 Jackson PS6T-KE: Crazy 8
    Jackson KVX10: X2N
    1997 Epi Les Paul Slash: Virtual PAF, Hum From Hell
    Early 90's Yamaha RGZ621D: JB, Screamin' Demon
    http://fusionken.blogspot.com
    http://project-jeng.blogspot.com

  16. #16
    Toneologist RG 2570's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    670
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    Quote Originally Posted by I_M_Ken
    well, i beg to differ, heh.
    i got a duncan pup in my Ibanez RG550 and that pup sounds a lot better than the few dimarzios i tried in there.
    the PATB-2 is in the bridge of my Ibanez Rg550.
    that duncan line is made for Ibanez and jackson type guitar exclusively
    I am refering to the regular pole models, the PATB series is all about making a ibanez or jackson sound better just as is most dimarzio's like the air zone,tone zone,breeds.
    I personally cant take the look of the PAtb pups and the limited models,BUT i was highly considering the PAtb-1 original set after talking to a duncan tech on the phone. he said it was a lot like the JB but fatter,warmer and more low end and the neck one is a perfect match
    I went with a tone zone which is about the same thing

  17. #17
    Toneologist mongrollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Spain
    Age
    34
    Posts
    608
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: Duncans and DiMarzios - Sum up the differences

    I have pickups from both brands and they both sound very good. From DiMarzio I have the PAF classic and the Blue Velvet (vintage strat) none of them are high output and both of them sound great.

    But i don't know most famous DiMarzio models are the high output ones. May be because the artist cover they have: Satriani, Vai, Paul Gilbert... etc.

    Anyway any of the Dimarzio models never got such a reputation as the 59 and JB models (and the Pearly Gates)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •