Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: is parallel useless?

  1. #1
    stonabus
    Guest

    Default is parallel useless?

    i dont notice anything but a volume drop. i feel like i wasted my time.

  2. #2
    Imperator of Indignation idsnowdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The UN Cafeteria
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13,868
    Likes (Given)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    300

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    What pickup are you using parallel? Nearly every pickup I like sounds good either way. With parallel it scoops out the mids and you get a cool psuedo acoustic effect. It really comes in handy with neck humbuckers that sound too loud and muddy. It tends to work better with higher output types. I don't like split at all.

  3. #3
    Ultimate Tone Slacker larry_emder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, AUS
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,761
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    It should sound different to series.

    WHether is it useless or not is upto you.

    I dont think it is useless for all pickups

  4. #4
    ReelItInologist danglybanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,987
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    parallel sounds telelike to me

    (I have avatars and sigs turned off. Do you?)

  5. #5
    Human powerplant Vasshu the humanoid typhoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    45
    Posts
    20,663
    Likes (Given)
    210
    Likes (Received)
    141

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    No more useless than splitting your pickup.
    Not gonna miss you know!
    Information is not knowledge.

  6. #6
    Administrator Evan Skopp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, USA
    Posts
    5,566
    Likes (Given)
    81
    Likes (Received)
    276

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    In one way it's better than splitting your pickup: you retain hum canceling.

  7. #7
    Mojo's Minions frankfalbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Ventura
    Posts
    3,537
    Likes (Given)
    36
    Likes (Received)
    88

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    I've got it on my Ibanez SC420, simply because the stock 5-way is hardwired for it. I've put PRS pickups in there, and the Vintage Bass neck pickup goes to parallel in position 2. I generally prefer split humbuckers over parallel, but in this guitar I'm stuck with it.

    So it's forced me to find uses for it, and I have. It's unique in that there's some inherent quack from running two "single coils" at the same time, but it's much more bland and homogenized than position 2 on a Strat because of the close proximity of the coils.

    One of the easiest uses for it is as a rhythm/lead setting for the neck pickup. Assuming you need "neck tone" for your rhythms, you can strum away and then switch to series for your solos, or to jump out in front of the mix for part of the song. When you split the pickup the tone changes drastically, so you have a more deliberate sound change. Parallel offers more tonal familiarity to the series tone, but with some more clarity and definition along with the output drop.

  8. #8
    Tone Member Brewtone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Age
    37
    Posts
    278
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    I have an old Washburn super strat from the 80's with a single push pull
    DPDT volume pot in it and I use this to swtich between series and parallel on a Dimarzio Tone Zone. I've never noticed much if any volume drop in parallel mode. The tone zone in parallel loses alot of it's mud and clears up quite a bit so I find it the easiest way to have two available sounds on this one pickup, one volume knob "practice machine"
    Guitars:
    Fender Strats
    Amps:
    Marshall Jubilee

    Quote Originally Posted by ErikH View Post
    It could be the awesomeness of listening to "Operation Mindcrime" clouding my judgement.

  9. #9
    Mojo's Minions Sludgenutz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Mojave Desert
    Age
    49
    Posts
    6,345
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    Quote Originally Posted by stonabus View Post
    i dont notice anything but a volume drop. i feel like i wasted my time.
    Great question and reponses! Just give it more time to sink in, Stonabus. The tonal spectrum is as idsnowdog says...plus, I find the picking hand becomes more relevant to the overall tone such a digging into the strings, and the picking position relative to the saddles.

    You gotta love the zero hum!

    I have my Epi Iommi, and an added 4P3T switch that allows both humbuckers to be simultaneously switched series/split/parallel. I really like it. It gives me the feeling of a having a three speed transmission on each pickup, tone wise.

    The switch (I think Artie Too told me about these):

    http://www.guitarelectronics.com/product/SWT36

    The 4 conductor Gibson 490R I had in my Epi LP for a while was sooooo muddy under gain (a well known issue with this pickup), I soldered it in permanently as a parallel humbucker. Otherwise, I would have thrown this pickup out the window.
    Last edited by Sludgenutz; 01-26-2007 at 04:46 PM.

  10. #10
    Lewguitar
    Guest

    Default Re: is parallel useless?

    I think the single coil mode sounds better than the parallel mode...but parallel does give you a single coil-ish tone and it's humcancelling. But the single coil mode has a stronger tone. My guitar has a three way switch for each humbucker that allows series, single or parallel. The parallel setting never gets used...but at least I now know what it sounds like. Lew

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •