Seymour Duncan SSL-1 California Set for Stratocaster

I’m a hardcore Les Paul lover. For years I refused to play anything else but Les Pauls. I tried to get all the tones I wanted from them, but three years ago that started to change. I got myself a hollowbody Les Paul and saw myself using that guitar for ‘hollowbody tones.’  With that guitar as a stepping stone, a small urge developed inside me to get a Strat and a Tele. Not just any Strat and Tele, but guitars based on vintage models: ash, alder, maple and rosewood, in the period correct combination.

It helps a lot to live in a place where high-end parts come (relatively) cheap, so I got myself some Strat and Tele bodies and necks, and with the help of some friends in my country (and some friends at Seymour Duncan) I started constructing. I’m used to having parts that fit together almost perfectly, so these parts proved to be more challenging than usual, but fun to do nonetheless.

So, the first guitar to be completed was a Strat. I don’t know why, but I felt like finishing the Strat first. And what did I come up with? A nice body made of two pieces of super lightweight alder with a moderate flamed maple top (just 3mm thick, so it won’t do anything for your tone – it’s there to look amazing, and in my opinion, it succeeds in that goal!). In the 60s Strats were made of alder and had a maple neck with a rosewood fingerboard, so I started searching for a nice maple neck with a rosewood fingerboard. And after 20 minutes of munching through a huge pile of necks I found the neck perfectly suited for my needs. A nice medium chunky neck with lovely perpendicular grains, topped with an Indian rosewood fingerboard. Dark, narrow-grained; just the way I like it. Of course, looks aren’t everything. I tapped each neck, again and again, to find the neck that had the best ring: the longest, the richest in fundamentals and harmonics, the one that I just had the  best ‘click’ with.

Even though Seymour Duncan’s California Set is based on the 50s and the neck and body are styled after 60s Strats, I went for the California set after all. These pickups were supposed to deliver a clear yet warm tone with a lot of clarity. Lots of highs, lots of smooth lows but not so many mids: exactly what I was looking for  for in a Strat.

So, after some hours of tinkering, screwing and soldering, my new Strat was finished. I turned on my mesa Mark II, and hit the first E chord. For some reason, the E chord is the first chord I always play when I test a new pickup, but I guess we all use the E chord whenever we get a new guitar…

The tone was amazing. Lovely bubbly on top, sweet and mellow in the mids and chunky. Those vintage Strat tones you always hear on records: this pickup set delivers the goods. I tried many Strats and most of them sound too modern: too tight, too hot, too much attack, too much mids, too much compression. But this set is extremely organic and pure. I am not sure, though, if it’s the pickups or just the woods are very dry and work great together. What I do know is that this set works very fine for me. I just can’t get over how clear and kind these pickups sounds. The in-between positions are extremely quacky, just the way you expect a Strat to quack.

Will it do the harder styles such as metal? I don’t think so, but let’s be honest: do you really want a set that can do those vintage tones so well to do metal? With the right amp and maybe a powerful stompbox you can push your set to do some 80s rock and metal, but when you endeavor into the higher gain territory, you might need a pickup with a bit more mids and just a tighter feel overall. But for what I want it to do, which means the softer, cleaner music styles, this set can hardly be beat.

About Orpheo

Orpheo is a long-time member of the Seymour Duncan forum with an interest in the technical side of luthery and pickups and plays jazz, blues, rock and metal on predominantly carved top single cutaway guitars.
This entry was posted in Pickup Reviews, Product News and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Dan Appleman

    It’s amazing that you think filling a few chips in your Tele body with filler will screw up the sound somehow, but a 3mm layer of maple glued to your Strat body “won’t do anything for your tone”.

  • Orpheo

    Dan appleman, you miss the point of the telecaster. That guitar has to be a beater. A complete workhorse without regard for looks. I was talking about pore filler, not chip filling.
    This strat has to balance isual attractiveness and utilitarian usability.

    Also, this body was a gift from a friend of mine. I didnt clearly specify that in the article cause i didnt deem that info relevant.

    • Dan Appleman

      I’m not talking about the point of the Telecaster, or whether or not the body was a gift. You have made two statements purely regarding tone. In this article you say that 3mm of maple glued to a Strat body won’t do anything for tone. In the other article you say that filling the chips will affect the tone to an unacceptable degree. This is baffling.

      • Dan Appleman

        Here are the two statements:

        1. “I could have used putty and fillers to fix the chips, but in my opinion those things only degrade the tone and that was a compromise I was absolutely not willing to make.”

        2. “super lightweight alder with a moderate flamed maple top (just 3mm thick, so it won’t do anything for your tone – it’s there to look amazing, and in my opinion, it succeeds in that goal!)”

        Do tell me how the fact that one body was a gift, or that a Tele should be a beater, somehow affects the fact that those two statements appear quite contradictory?

  • Orpheo

    Tele was bought but had best tap tone and best potential to give a good guitar. And i feel that porefillers, fillers in general, are not beneficial for tone.

    Strat was a gift already finished. (without porefillee by the way).

    I didnt know that someone would split hairs about fillers in a pickup review otherwise I would have formulated more carefully.

    So. To summarize.

    I dont like porefillers.
    I wanted a good tele body that resonated well.
    I wanted a ‘beater’ tele.

    Those aspects made me Choose not to use filler.

    Strat was a gift. Why argue over a gift.

    • Dan Appleman

      Whether you wanted a beater tele, or a body was a gift, really has absolutely no effect on the statements that you made. You have stated firstly that filler affects tone, and secondly that a 3mm layer of maple glued to the body does not. Do you stand by both those statements? If not, which one is wrong?

  • kingbingo909

    Appleman needs therapy? Some of the most angry people we ever meet are also the most depressed. They are hurting and can’t seem to not hurt other people nor understand that they are their worst enemy. Lighten up if you can, man. These are the good old days if you let them be.

  • Eliappleapple

    Perspective, oh Danny boy. I think it was Jim Morrison at the beginning of a show that said…. “I’m gonna get my kicks before this whole shit-house goes up in flames.” This is guitar tone not politics brother. Both are hard to achieve, but when it’s right, it feels oh-so-right! It’s an honest mistake, but great tone don’t play no favorites. and it sure doesn’t get caught up in the off-key jingle-jangle-dangle of all that Orpheo did wrong on the way to “getting right!” Its hard to get that perfect tone, and I appreciate having a guide trying to find what is right for me or you. chips, filler, beautiful flame maple tops are just part of the journey… **(All this being said by some random guy about three months too late)***

    I stumbled onto your blog while looking for that perfect pickup. Simple approach that says it all, been a huge help Orpheo. I just recently came across an 85 Japanese 62 Custom Tele that I am looking for those perfect pickups for. Love all your reviews including the strat ones! Cheers Mate, and Matetts.